The notion of Universal Banking

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/255fafee-8872-11e5-90de-f44762bf9896.html

  • Glass-Steagall (enacted during the Great Depression) stipulated that traditional, relatively low-risk banking such as taking deposits and making loans could not be undertaken by the same institutions that were involved in higher risk investment banking activities
  • In 1999, the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed to move beyond straightforward bank borrowing, and tap the capital markets directly
  • We were wrong about two things, majorly:
    1. Scale brings costs down – very few cost efficiencies that come from the merger of functions
    2. Culture – Mixing incompatible cultures is a problem all by itself
  • Traditional bankers – extroverts, sociable, focused on long term relationships, customer centric and are risk averse
  • Investment bankers – short termist, focused on immediate reward, seek risk, product centric
  • Need for a modern Glass-Steagall law, which would effectively end the universal banking model
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s